Geometer moths (Geometridae)
Announcements
Discussion
donhe
wrote:
2 hrs ago
In BOLD, there seem to be more unnamed than named Australian species of Rhuma. Perhaps its one of those: EF05 looks possible
https://bench.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=535431
https://bench.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=535431
Rhuma (genus)
WendyEM
wrote:
Yesterday
both C. wilsoni and C. alpina are very similar and can be separated by the patches on the undersides (Moths of Vic Part 4 CD pages)
Cyneoterpna wilsoni
WendyEM
wrote:
Yesterday
from the species in Moths of Victoria Part4 the closest I can get is H. diffundens
Hypobapta diffundens
WendyEM
wrote:
Yesterday
The male underside here http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/geom/thiobapta.html does not fit above. It may be female or another moth ? I think I can just see antennae in 2nd shot - MAY be female (do not appear to be pectinate like males are).
Rhuma (genus)
WendyEM
wrote:
Yesterday
Rhuma thiobapta appears to be the best match in Moths of Vic Part 4. That Vic record was for far NW corner (Neds Corner)
On BOLD https://portal.boldsystems.org/bin/BOLD:AAF2497 confusingly there is also https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=72244
On BOLD https://portal.boldsystems.org/bin/BOLD:AAF2497 confusingly there is also https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=72244
Rhuma (genus)
Top contributors
- kasiaaus 1K
- jb2602 947
- WendyEM 498
- AlisonMilton 477
- SteveBorkowskis 318
- ibaird 312
- ConBoekel 303
- Hejor1 179
- LisaH 150
- MichaelBedingfield 144
Top moderators
- donhe 3.7K
- ibaird 3.3K
- DianneClarke 272
- MichaelMulvaney 77
- MichaelBedingfield 20
- kasiaaus 18
- jb2602 18
- WendyEM 5
- RAllen 2
- AlisonMilton 2
